arital Dissolution, Annulment and Separation; Mediation and Conciliation Services; Family Abuse

Prevention

ORS sections in this chapter were amended or repealed by the Legislative Assembly during its 2024 regular session.

See the table of ORS sections amended or repealed during the 2024 regular session: 2024 A&R Tables

2023 EDITION

DISSOLUTION, ANNULMENT AND SEPARATION

DOMESTIC RELATIONS

DISSOLUTION, ANNULMENT AND SEPARATION

107.005 Annulment of void marriage; declaration of validity; effect of declaration

107.015 Grounds for annulment or dissolution of marriage

107.025 Irreconcilable differences as grounds for dissolution or separation

107.036 Doctrines of fault and in pari delicto abolished; evidence and consideration of fault

107.046 Appearance by public official

107.055 Appearance by respondent; affirmative defenses abolished

107.075 Residence requirements

107.085 Petition; title; content

107.086 Where to file petition

107.087 When petition to be served on Division of Child Support

timeline

title [Corbin Parise vs. Kiela Manes Custody Timeline - Expanded]

section 2015

2015-06-09: Initial custody petition filed by Corbin Parise, seeking custody of Carly Parise. **Significance:** This marks the beginning of the Chapter custody dispute and sets the stage for the legal proceedings to follow.

2015-06-09: Corbin files for a Fee Deferral Waiver. **Significance:** This suggests potential financial hardship and may be relevant to future legal arguments or requests for assistance.

2015-06-09: Kiela Manes is served with legal documents. **Significance:** This initiates the formal legal process, notifying Kiela of the custody petition.

2015-06-09: The case is assigned to Judge Anne Marie Simmons. **Significance:** This marks the beginning of Judge Simmons' involvement in the case, which may be relevant to future concerns about bias.

2015-06-09: Kiela Manes files an Immediate Danger motion, alleging that Corbin Parise is a danger to Carly Parise. **Significance:** This early attempt by Kiela to gain custody suggests an ongoing pattern of manipulation and conflict.

2015-06-09: The court denies Kiela Manes's Immediate Danger motion. **Significance:** This suggests that the court did not find sufficient evidence to support Kiela's claims. It also could be used to challenge Kiela's credibility in future proceedings.

2015-07-23: A financial transaction labeled "Counter Payment" is recorded. **Significance:** The exact nature of this transaction is unclear, but it could be related to child support or legal fees.

2015-08-21: The court assigns a mediation session to the parties. **Significance:** This suggests an attempt to resolve the dispute outside of court.

2015-08-26: Another financial transaction labeled "Counter Payment" is recorded. **Significance:** Similar to the previous transaction, the details are unclear, but it could be related to child support or legal fees.

2015-09-07: An incident occurs involving "shots fired" and broken glass. **Significance:** This suggests a potentially volatile situation and may be relevant to future arguments about safety and well-being.

2015-09-09: Mediation hearing takes place, with no agreement reached. **Significance:** This highlights the ongoing conflict and the parties' inability to resolve the dispute amicably.

2015-09-14: Mediation fails, and the court orders the parties to continue with the legal process. **Significance:** This signifies the failure of an attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation, potentially indicating a high-conflict situation.

2015-09-14: An Affidavit in Support of the State's Appearance is filed. **Significance:** This indicates the involvement of a third party, possibly the Department of Human Services (DHS) or the Child Support Program, in the case.

2015-09-14: A "Waiver of Appearance" is filed. **Significance:** This suggests a possible agreement or a lack of contention regarding certain aspects of the case.

2015-10-06: A financial transaction is recorded. **Significance:** The exact nature of this transaction is unclear, but it could be related to child support or legal fees.

section 2016

2016-10-24: Kiela Manes files for a custody modification and an Immediate Danger motion. **Significance:** This indicates a change in circumstances or a desire to alter the current arrangement.

2016-10-24: Kiela files an Immediate Danger motion, alleging that Corbin Parise is a danger to Carly Parise. **Significance:** This is a serious claim, suggesting a potential threat to Carly's safety.

2016-10-24: Corbin is served with legal documents related to the custody modification and Immediate Danger motion. **Significance:** This is a crucial step in the legal process, formally notifying Corbin of the new filings.

2016-10-24: Proof of service is filed, but there are questions about whether Corbin was properly served with these legal documents, indicating potential procedural violations. **Significance:** This suggests that the process may not have been followed correctly, potentially leading to an unfair outcome.

2016-10-27: Kiela applies for a Fee Deferral Waiver. **Significance:** This suggests potential financial hardship and may be relevant to future legal arguments or requests for assistance.

2016-10-27: A financial transaction labeled "Counter Payment" is recorded. **Significance:** The exact nature of this transaction is unclear, but it could be related to child support or legal fees.

2016-10-28: Kiela files a motion for "Finding of Immediate Danger." **Significance:** This is the second time Kiela files for an Immediate Danger motion, suggesting a pattern of behavior and a persistent belief that Corbin is a danger to Carly.

2016-10-28: A hearing is held regarding the Immediate Danger motion before Judge Stanton. **Significance:** This is a key hearing in the case, with the court deciding whether to grant Kiela's request for temporary custody.

2016-10-28: Judge Stanton denies the Immediate Danger motion. **Significance:** This suggests that the court did not find sufficient evidence to support Kiela's claims. It also could be used to challenge Kiela's credibility in future proceedings.

2016-10-28: Judge Stanton issues an Order to Show Cause for the modification of custody, parenting time, and child support. **Significance:** This indicates the case will proceed to a full hearing on these issues.

section 2021

2021-12-06: Kiela files for a restraining order against Corbin. **Significance:** This is a significant escalation in the conflict, potentially restricting Corbin's access to Carly.

2021-12-17: Hearing on Immediate Danger and Restraining Order. **Significance:** This is a crucial hearing, with the court deciding whether to grant Kiela's request for a restraining order and potentially temporary custody.

2021-12-23: Immediate Danger and Restraining Order dismissed, but Judge Simmons orders weekly drug tests for Corbin despite lack of evidence. **Significance:** This is a major point of contention. Corbin was never charged with a crime related to the alleged "immediate danger," and the judge's decision to order drug tests without any evidence of drug use suggests a potential bias.

2021-12-23: Corbin was never served with any contesting order to the Immediate Danger motion. **Significance:** This raises concerns about the fairness of the proceedings and the potential violation of Corbin's due process rights.

2021-12-23: The court orders a 50/50 parenting time schedule, with the condition that Corbin provide weekly drug tests. **Significance:** This is the first indication of a custody arrangement, which is later modified.

2021-12-30: Corbin applies for a Fee Deferral Waiver. **Significance:** This suggests potential financial hardship and may be relevant to future legal arguments or requests for assistance.

section 2022

2022-01-04: Corbin files a Response to a modification regarding custody and parenting time. **Significance:** This suggests that Corbin is actively contesting Kiela's attempts to modify the custody arrangement.

2022-01-06: Corbin files a Motion to Show Cause for the enforcement of the parenting plan. **Significance:** This indicates that Corbin is seeking to enforce the existing custody agreement.

2022-01-10: A custody hearing is held. **Significance:** This is a key hearing, potentially with a decision on the custody arrangement or a further modification.

2022-01-11: Corbin formally objects to a proposed custody modification order, refusing to provide Kiela with access to his mental health records (ROI). **Significance:** This highlights Corbin's concern about Kiela's motives and her attempts to access sensitive information.

2022-01-12: A judgment is signed, likely in favor of Kiela, based on the default judgment. **Significance:** This suggests that Corbin may not have been properly notified of the hearing or had the opportunity to present his case.

2022-01-18: Corbin writes a letter to Judge Simmons, requesting a review of service deficiencies and potential judicial bias. **Significance:** This indicates Corbin's increasing awareness of potential legal violations and judicial bias.

2022-04-08: Custody is transferred to Kiela. **Significance:** This is a significant change in the custody arrangement, potentially with no clear justification or consideration of Carly's best interests.

section 2023

2023-03-06: Supplemental Judgment modifying custody signed. **Significance:** This modification was likely filed in response to the earlier custody hearing and the default judgment.

2023-03-13: Corbin discovers the default judgment and is denied access to Carly at school. **Significance:** This highlights the procedural errors and the lack of proper notification to Corbin, potentially leading to an unfair outcome.

2023-03-20: Corbin allegedly leaves a baby doll on Kiela's windshield while she is at church. **Significance:** This incident may be one of the incidents cited in Kiela's stalking order petition.

2023-03-22: Judge Simmons informs Corbin that his letters will not be considered because he had not properly served Kiela. **Significance:** This highlights a potential procedural error and raises concerns about the judge's willingness to consider Corbin's evidence.

2023-04-02: Corbin allegedly shows up at Kiela's church and tries to pull Karlee out of Sunday school. **Significance:** This incident may be another event cited in Kiela's stalking order petition.

2023-04-22: Corbin allegedly drives by Kiela's house after attempting to speak with her. **Significance:** This incident may also be cited in the stalking order petition.

2023-04-24: Kiela files for a stalking order against Corbin. **Significance:** This legal action further limits Corbin's access to Carly and escalates the conflict.

section 2024

2024-04-30: Hearing on contempt of court motion. **Significance:** This hearing addresses Corbin's alleged non-compliance with the court order.

2024-05-12: Confrontation at a custody exchange. **Significance:** This highlights the ongoing conflict and Kiela's unwillingness to cooperate.

2024-05-25: Kiela confronts Courtney at her home. **Significance:** This incident shows Kiela's aggressive and potentially harassing behavior.

2024-05-28: Courtney files a motion to intervene as a co-petitioner. **Significance:** This shows Courtney's commitment to protecting Carly and challenging Kiela's actions.

2024-06-05: Carly has a therapy appointment, but there are no notes on her chart. **Significance:** This raises concerns about potential attempts to hide or manipulate information about Carly's well-being.

2024-06-18: Father's Day visitation denied. **Significance:** This highlights Kiela's continued refusal to cooperate and her disregard for the court order.

2024-06-23 - 25: Visit disrupted, Kiela expresses frustration. **Significance:** This highlights Kiela's lack of cooperation and her unwillingness to compromise.

2024-06-28: 4-hour visit at Corbin and Courtney's apartment. **Significance:** This indicates a small step towards restoring parenting time.

2024-07-12: Kiela insists on strict adherence to the court order. **Significance:** This shows a continued pattern of non-compliance and potentially manipulative behavior.

2024-07-13: Corbin files a Motion to Show Cause. **Significance:** This indicates Corbin's continued efforts to enforce the custody order and protect his rights.

Questions you may be interested in:

How does Corbin plan to address the allegations of HIPAA violations and protect his privacy rights in the court proceedings?

What specific parenting challenges does Corbin face in his interactions with Kyla, and how does he aim to resolve them?

In what ways does Corbin believe the court can improve the current custody arrangement to benefit Carly's mental health and overall wellbeing?

UPDF AI: Section 1: Introduction to the Conversation Corbin (CP) and Courtney (CO) are discussing strategies related to a contempt charge filed by Kiela against CP. CP emphasizes that everything he says is the truth, not allegations, and requests support in presenting his side of the narrative. The conversation outlines plans to provide transcribed discussions between CP and CO regarding courtrelated matters.

Section 2: Planning Strategies CP and CO discuss creating an online learning environment and overcoming language barriers. They plan to revise a parenting plan to show cooperation and compromise for Carly's best interest. The goal is to structure things in Carly's best interest, providing her with support and a voice.

Section 3: RealTime Communication CP and CO use the chat platform for realtime communication and reviewing each other's messages. They acknowledge Courtney's tendency to talk a lot and express mutual love and collaboration as advocates for Carly. There is determination to fight against Kiela's control and regain custody of Carly.

Section 4: Analyzing Contempt Claims CP questions if Kiela's claims qualify as contempt, believing they may be baseless and aimed at creating more issues. He seeks to combat each claim made by Kiela, turning the spotlight on her and making her answer for her statements. The goal is to flip the script and show Kiela as the one potentially in contempt before the court.

Section 5: Focusing on Specific Contempt Issues CP aims to address specific issues raised by Kiela, such as noncompliance with parenting time stipulations. Videos of Kiela and her daughter on YouTube raise concerns about unsupervised interactions, prompting a focus on safety. CP plans to file for contempt based on Kiela's statements indicating noncompliance with court orders during spring break.

Section 6: Preparation for Legal Action CP emphasizes the need to be prepared for potential surprises from Kiela regarding parenting time. Plans include filing for contempt if Kiela disobeys court orders and ensuring enforcement of parenting time to secure time with Carly. CP highlights the importance of being proactive and strategic in legal actions against Kiela.

Section 7: Seeking Clarity on Court Orders CP seeks clarity on what actions are necessary to enforce parenting time and ensure compliance with court orders. The focus is on understanding the legal requirements and procedures to secure time with Carly and address Kiela's potential noncompliance.

Section 8: Addressing Deception and Safety Concerns CP expresses concerns about Kiela's deceptive behavior and the need to address safety issues, especially regarding unsupervised interactions on YouTube. Plans involve taking legal action to ensure Carly's safety and wellbeing, despite Kiela's attempts to deceive and manipulate the situation.

Section 9: Strategic Approach to Legal Proceedings CP emphasizes the importance of a strategic approach to legal proceedings, focusing on exposing Kiela's deceptive tactics and ensuring Carly's safety. The goal is to present a strong case highlighting Kiela's misconduct and noncompliance with court orders. CP aims to navigate the legal process effectively to protect Carly's best interests and secure parenting time.

Contempt Filing Analysis Kyla's allegations appear to exploit gray areas or contradict facts stated elsewhere in the transcripts. There is a pattern of escalating accusations from Kyla when she feels she is losing control, indicating a strategic rather than genuine approach. Kyla's history of making false claims undermines her credibility regarding contempt accusations.

Spring Break Violation Concerns The user is rightfully concerned about Kyla potentially withholding Carly over spring break. Detailed documentation of any blocked contact or access denial is crucial to establish a clear record if needed. Maintaining a log of all details before and during scheduled visitation is essential to address any violations effectively.

Parental Alienation Statutes/Case Law Courts generally recognize alienating behaviors as detrimental to the child's best interests. Documenting a clear pattern of alienation is crucial to support legal arguments. Specific statutes related to parental alienation may vary by jurisdiction, requiring expertise in OR family law.

Contempt vs Modification Contempt involves failing to comply with an existing court order, while modification seeks official changes to the order terms. Kyla's actions seem aimed more at seeking modification rather than proving contempt. The distinction between contempt and modification is important in legal proceedings to address specific violations or seek alterations to custody arrangements.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Analysis of Kyla's Word Choices Kyla strategically uses loaded terms like pressuring, manipulate, and safety to trigger emotional responses and align with court priorities. Examples of trigger words used by Kyla in potentially misleading ways are provided, highlighting the discrepancy between her language and the actual content of the situations described.

Section 2: Examination of Specific Allegations Specific allegations made by Kyla, such as Corbin pressuring her to allow things outside the court order, are analyzed for their validity and relevance. The importance of scrutinizing Kyla's claims and contrasting them with factual evidence is emphasized to expose any potential manipulation or misrepresentation.

Section 3: Potential Oregon Statutes Relevant to False Accusations General guidance on Oregon statutes related to false accusations and contempt is provided, including ORS 163.257, ORS 162.375, ORS 33.015, and ORS 107.135. Suggestions are given on how these statutes could be applied to counter false allegations and interference with parental rights in the legal context.

Section 4: Legal Principles and Strategies for Defense Additional legal principles to research, such as the Doctrine of Unclean Hands and Parental Alienation, are outlined as potential strategies to counter false allegations and interference. Recommendations are made to document reasonable requests, communications with Kyla, and Carly's statements to strengthen the defense against baseless claims.

Section 5: Addressing Lack of Specificity in Allegations Kyla's vague allegation of being pressured multiple times to allow things outside the court order is examined for its lack of specificity and supporting evidence. The reasonable nature of Corbin's requests for additional contact with Carly is highlighted to challenge Kyla's characterization of these requests as pressure.

Section 6: Highlighting Reasonable Requests and Strengthening Relationship Corbin's efforts to strengthen his relationship with Carly through reasonable requests are discussed in contrast to Kyla's attempts to portray them as inappropriate pressure tactics. The alignment of Corbin's actions with the court's guidance on strengthening the fatherdaughter relationship is emphasized to refute Kyla's misleading claims.

Section 7: Protecting Privacy Rights Regarding Health Information A letter drafted by Corbin to Judge Simmons regarding the release of mental health assessment information is analyzed for its emphasis on privacy concerns and boundaries. Corbin's proactive approach to complying with the court order while safeguarding sensitive health information is highlighted as a key aspect of protecting his rights.

Section 8: Proactive Explanation for Delay in Submitting Documentation Corbin's proactive explanation for the delay in submitting the release of information form is examined to address potential questions about timing. The importance of seeking legal counsel and ensuring thorough compliance with the court's directives is emphasized to demonstrate diligence and transparency.

Section 9: Mock Contempt Hearing Preparation Preparation for a mock contempt hearing involving Kyla, Corbin, and the judge is outlined, focusing on objections, crossexamination, and addressing potential scenarios. Key aspects of the hearing process, including presenting cases, objecting to evidence, and engaging in crossexamination, are detailed to simulate a realistic courtroom scenario.

Section 10: Role Play Dynamics and Legal Strategy The dynamics of roleplaying Kyla, Corbin, and the judge in a mock hearing are discussed, emphasizing the importance of objections, corrections, and legal strategy. Strategies for addressing burden of proof issues, objections, and maintaining a factbased defense approach are highlighted to prepare for various challenges during the hearing.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Ms. Maines' Demand for Immediate ROI Access Corbin Parise emphasizes that Kiela Maines demanded immediate access to the ROI, which he found inappropriate and premature. He had not started the assessment process at the time of her request and wanted the ROI to clearly state its purpose for the initial intake only.

Section 2: Protection of Mental Health and Privacy Corbin highlights the importance of protecting his mental health and privacy, which he learned through counseling and therapy are crucial for his wellbeing. He took steps to safeguard his personal information and ensure compliance with the court's orders.

Section 3: Consistency in Compliance Corbin asserts that the evidence demonstrates his consistency in adhering to the requirements regarding the ROI and following the court's orders. Despite facing a contempt charge in 2022 after clean UAs, he remained committed to fulfilling his obligations.

Section 4: Request for Clarification Corbin may request clarification from the judge regarding the appropriateness of Ms. Maines' demand for immediate ROI access. He seeks to ensure that the court understands his perspective on the importance of privacy and compliance with the assessment process.

Section 5: Premature Request Concerns Corbin expresses concerns about the premature nature of Ms. Maines' request for the ROI, given that he had not yet initiated the assessment process. He underscores the need for clarity and specificity in the purpose of disclosing personal information through the ROI.

Section 6: Importance of Mental Health Corbin underscores the significance of protecting his mental health and privacy, especially in the context of undergoing counseling and therapy. He emphasizes the role of these factors in maintaining his overall wellbeing and ability to comply with court orders.

Section 7: Commitment to Compliance Corbin reiterates his commitment to complying with the court's directives and ensuring that his actions align with the stipulated requirements. Despite past challenges, such as facing a contempt charge in 2022, he remains dedicated to upholding his responsibilities.

Section 8: Upholding Privacy Rights Corbin stresses the importance of upholding his privacy rights and ensuring that any disclosure of personal information is done in accordance with legal and ethical standards. He seeks to protect his confidential data while fulfilling his obligations under the court's orders.

Section 9: Seeking Fair Treatment Corbin may express a desire for fair treatment and understanding from the court regarding his stance on the ROI and the protection of his mental health and privacy. He aims to clarify any misconceptions or misinterpretations surrounding his actions and intentions.

Section 10: Conclusion and Next Steps Corbin concludes by highlighting the need for a clear understanding of the circumstances surrounding the ROI request and his commitment to following the court's orders. He looks forward to the judge's guidance and a fair resolution that considers his concerns and respects his rights to privacy and compliance.

UPDF AI: Exposing Kyla's Manipulative Tactics Compile a detailed timeline documenting Kyla's pattern of making false allegations, withholding information, and engaging in parental alienation. Subpoena records from the Family Wizard app, emails, text messages to show the court Kyla's contradictory statements and behavior. Gather witness statements from third parties who can attest to Kyla's manipulation or attempts to interfere with the father's parenting time.

Demonstrating Harm to the Child Obtain Karlee's mental health and school records showing the decline in her wellbeing and academic performance since the change in custody. Have Karlee evaluated by a child psychologist to assess the emotional impact of Kyla's behavior. Call Karlee's therapist or counselor to testify about statements Karlee has made regarding her desires and difficulties with her mother.

Evidence of Facade and Manipulation Create a chart comparing Kyla's friendly communications with her legal filings and allegations against the father. Provide evidence of Kyla making similar overtures of cooperation in the past just before filing motions to restrict the father's parenting time. Cite the psychological phenomenon of lovebombing often employed by manipulators, drawing parallels to Kyla's behavior.

Highlighting Patterns in the Family Wizard Journal Identify instances where Kyla makes agreements in writing then later denies or contradicts those agreements in court filings. Point out Kyla's refusal to engage in substantive conversations about coparenting issues or respond to the father's inquiries. Emphasize gaps in communication from Kyla that align with periods she was filing legal motions without the father's knowledge.

Conveying Father's Proactive Approach Submit a detailed log of all the father's attempts to coparent and propose schedules. Provide copies of all motions and petitions filed by the father seeking to enforce his parental rights. Obtain a calendar showing the father's consistent exercise of his allocated parenting time and any makeup time offered when Kyla interfered.

Legal Remedies for Lack of Court Action File a motion for contempt against Kyla for any documented violations of existing court orders. Submit a formal complaint to the presiding judge or judicial conduct commission regarding the assigned judge's failure to address the issues. Retain an attorney to file a writ of mandamus, asking a higher court to compel the lower court to properly consider the evidence of Kyla's misconduct.

Preemptive Measures for Spring Break File an emergency motion with the court reiterating the father's courtordered parenting time for spring break and requesting specific dates/times be confirmed.

UPDF AI: Section 1: False Allegations Laws in Oregon Perjury in civil cases for false allegations made under oath (ORS 162.065). Filing a false police report is a Class A misdemeanor in criminal cases (ORS 162.375).

Section 2: Parental Alienation Considerations Oregon lacks a specific law on parental alienation. Courts may factor in parental alienation when determining the child's best interests (ORS 107.137).

Section 3: Custodial Interference Regulations Custodial interference is a crime in Oregon (ORS 163.245 to 163.257). Involves actions like taking, enticing, or keeping a child against custody orders.

Section 4: Sanctions and Restrictions in Custody Cases Oregon courts can impose sanctions, modifications, or restrictions for misconduct (ORS 107.135). Sanctions may include modifying custody arrangements, supervised visitation, counseling, or awarding attorney fees.

Section 5: Stalking Orders and Legal Procedures Respondents can contest stalking orders based on false allegations (ORS 30.866). Courts may dismiss the order and award attorney fees if false allegations are proven.

Section 6: Handling of Criminal and Civil Matters Criminal and civil matters are typically handled separately in legal proceedings. Application of laws varies based on the specifics of each case.

Section 7: Importance of Evidence in Proving Allegations Proving parental alienation, false allegations, or malicious intent requires substantial evidence. Consultation with an experienced family law attorney is recommended for guidance in navigating legal complexities.

Section 8: Challenges in Addressing Parental Misconduct Addressing parental misconduct such as alienation or interference poses challenges in custody cases. Legal system nuances require careful consideration and strategic approach.

Section 9: Legal Framework for Child Custody Disputes Oregon statutes provide a framework for addressing custody disputes and parental misconduct. Courts have discretion in applying sanctions and modifications to protect the child's best interests.

Section 10: Legal Guidance and Expertise Seeking legal counsel from a knowledgeable family law attorney is crucial in complex custody cases. Attorneys can offer tailored advice, representation, and assistance in navigating legal intricacies.

UPDF AI: Title of section 1: Conflicts of Interest

The judge admits to being a neighbor of Ms. Manes but claims no personal familiarity with her. Swift dismissal of Mr. Parisee's motion for clarification raises concerns of bias.

Title of section 2: Financial Insensitivity

Judge shifts financial burden of supervision costs to Mr. Parisee without consideration of his financial constraints. Unilateral removal of appointed supervisor adds to financial hardship.

Title of section 3: Failure to Provide Legal Guidance

Refusal to offer written clarification on stalking order, directing to audio recordings instead. Lack of substantive guidance on avoiding stalking order violations in practical scenarios.

Title of section 4: Apathy and Disrespect in Tone and Demeanor

Judge displays apathy towards missing critical details. Mocking attitude towards legitimate concerns raised by Mr. Parisee.

Title of section 5: Questionable Judicial Conduct

Statements indicating lack of concern for Mr. Parisee's position. Disparaging responses and insensitivity towards parental rights.

Title of section 6: Bias and Unfairness

Judge denies bias accusations but displays biased behavior. Dismissive tone towards Mr. Parisee's concerns.

Title of section 7: Insensitivity and Lack of Empathy

Judge shows insensitivity towards Mr. Parisee's financial struggles. Disregard for financial implications on Mr. Parisee.

Title of section 8: Disrespectful Language and Attitude

Disrespectful dismissal of Mr. Parisee's focus on parental rights. Dismissive tone when discussing child visitation priorities.

Title of section 9: Lack of Clarity and Responsiveness

Judge fails to provide clear answers to Mr. Parisee's questions. Dodges addressing due process concerns raised by Mr. Parisee.

Title of section 10: Inadequate Handling of Evidence

Judge's treatment of video evidence versus verbal testimony raises questions about impartiality. Unequal evaluation of evidence presented by both parties.

UPDF AI: Title of section 1: Overview of CourtRelated Conversation Transcript The transcript involves multiple parties discussing legal issues in a custody case. Key concerns include errors in court paperwork, lack of proper notification, and conflicts of interest.

Title of section 2: Contradictions in Statements Trial Court Administrator claims notice sent to both parties on the same day but later admits lack of definitive proof (14:2914:36). Conflicting statements about receipt of documents and service notifications raise legal implications.

Title of section 3: Legal Implications of Mishandling Paperwork Mishandling of paperwork and notices violates due process and procedural rules. Potential conflicts of interest with judges and administrators impact fair hearings.

Title of section 4: Strategy Formulation for Addressing Procedural Violations Document each instance of procedural violations with evidence and references. File formal complaints outlining breaches of judicial code and request investigations.

Title of section 5: Alternative Terminology for Judicial Improprieties Breaches of judicial code Lapses in due process Concerning breakdowns in courtroom norms

Title of section 6: Contradictions and Attempts to Cover Up Errors Trial Court Administrator admits to mistakes but tries to excuse them as corrections. Shifts blame away from staff's role and cites staffing issues as reasons for errors.

Title of section 7: Disrespectful Communication and Tone Analysis Judge's dismissive tone towards concerns raised by Mr. Parisee. Mocking stance towards legitimate apprehensions as a caring parent.

Title of section 8: Handling of Contempt Motion and Supervisor Change Judge shifts focus from contempt motion to supervisor change without proper procedure. Decision to replace supervisor based solely on verbal testimony raises procedural concerns.

Title of section 9: Due Process and Procedural Concerns Unilateral evidence destruction notice raises serious due process issues. Violation of evidence retention regulations compromises defendant's legal rights.

Title of section 10: Comprehensive Prompt for Detailed Analysis Detailed prompt to analyze complex child custody case involving Mr. Corbin Parisee and Ms. Kiela Manes. Objectives include identifying instances of bias, contradictions, due process violations, and suggesting litigation strategies.

Title of section 11: Inquiry and Narrative Analysis Narrative outlines a prolonged child custody dispute with perceived judicial improprieties. Strategies suggested include documenting incidents, filing complaints, and leveraging due process arguments.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Background of Corbin Parise and Karlee Manes Corbin Parise is the father of Karlee Parise, a 9yearold girl. Corbin initially had primary custody of Karlee due to Kiela Manes' drug addiction and toxic relationships. Kiela lost custody of her other children to the state due to her issues with drugs and abusive relationships.

Section 2: Custody Arrangement History Corbin gained sole custody of Karlee after nearly two years of legal battles. Corbin raised Karlee on his own for over five years, advocating for her relationship with Kiela. Corbin entered into a relationship with Courtney Frye, now Parise, and they have been married for over two years.

Section 3: Recent Legal Challenges Kiela filed for an immediate danger order against Corbin, alleging drug use and unsafe situations for Karlee without evidence. Despite Corbin's compliance and negative drug test results, the court ordered him to provide weekly UA results to Kiela. The court granted Kiela custodial rights, leading to distress for Karlee and Corbin.

Section 4: PostCustody Change Challenges Kiela made it difficult for Corbin to maintain a relationship with Karlee postcustody change. Kiela filed for a modification to reduce Corbin's parenting time without prior discussion or notice. Kiela filed for default against Corbin, claiming he had no stable place for Karlee despite evidence to the contrary.

Section 5: Impact on Karlee and Corbin Karlee showed signs of distress during transitions between homes. Corbin's attempts to communicate and coparent were met with threats and avoidance by Kiela. Kiela's actions led to a stalking order against Corbin based on false accusations of drug use.

Section 6: Legal Motions and Responses Corbin filed motions to dismiss default, reconsider the stalking order, and hold Kiela in contempt for missed visits, all of which were denied. Kiela successfully removed the courtappointed supervisor despite falsifying facts in an incident. Corbin's motions for contact with Karlee were consistently denied by the court.

Section 7: Ongoing Impact on ParentChild Relationship Corbin has been without contact with Karlee for six months due to false accusations and legal denials. Kiela's actions have negatively impacted Karlee's mental health, as noted in school counselor reports. Despite evidence supporting Corbin's claims, the court has not held Kiela accountable for denying access to Karlee.

Section 8: Emotional Toll on Corbin Corbin's efforts to maintain a relationship with Karlee have been met with legal obstacles and denials. The denial of motions and continued false accusations have taken a toll on Corbin's emotional wellbeing. Corbin's persistence in seeking legal recourse has not yielded positive outcomes in reestablishing contact with Karlee.

Section 9: Legal System Challenges The court's decisions have favored Kiela despite evidence contradicting her claims. Corbin's attempts to navigate the legal system to regain contact with Karlee have been met with repeated denials. The impact of the court's rulings on Corbin's parental rights and Karlee's wellbeing remains significant.

Section 10: Future Legal Strategies Corbin may need to explore alternative legal strategies or avenues to address the ongoing challenges in regaining contact with Karlee. Seeking legal counsel or advocacy support to navigate the complexities of the custody dispute may be beneficial. Documenting all interactions and evidence meticulously to strengthen future legal arguments and motions.

UPDF AI: Title of section 1: Background Information Keila Manes filed for a Stalking Protective Order (SPO) against Corbin Parise in April 2023. Concerns were raised about Karlee's mental health and emotional stability, leading to attempts to communicate with Keila. Keila restricted Corbin's parenting time, prompting the SPO filing.

Title of section 2: False Allegations and Past Legal Actions Keila falsely claimed Corbin was stalking her based on attending church with Karlee as per the daughter's request. Previous restraining order filed by Keila in December 2021 was dismissed after false claims were disproven. The current SPO remains in place, preventing contact between Corbin and Karlee.

Title of section 3: Impact on ParentChild Relationship The SPO has caused severe trauma and loss by restricting Corbin's access to Karlee. Efforts have been made to maintain contact and communication during the period of the unjustified order. The severed relationship has led to emotional distress for Karlee.

Title of section 4: Violation of Parental Rights Terminating the fatherdaughter bond without cause violates Corbin's constitutionally protected liberty interest. The SPO essentially terminates Corbin's rights as a fit parent without due process. The violation of rights is connected to the emotional damage caused to Karlee.

Title of section 5: Establishing Pattern of False Allegations Specific examples of past disproven allegations made by Keila should be highlighted. Patterns between previous false allegations and the current SPO petition should be emphasized. Misuse of legal actions to control and restrict access rather than ensure safety should be argued.

Title of section 6: Showing Harm to ParentChild Relationship Focus on how sustaining the SPO would further damage the relationship between Corbin and Karlee. Cite specific examples from Karlee's therapy/counseling showing emotional distress. Emphasize efforts made to maintain contact and communication despite the unjustified order.

Title of section 7: Citing Relevant Case Law Troxel v. Granville (2000) Affirmed parents' fundamental rights concerning child's care/custody. Cannot infringe without proving parent unfit. Argue that the SPO violates Corbin's rights without proof of parental unfitness.

Title of section 8: Citing Relevant Case Law C.Q.R. v. Wafula Stalking order requires reasonable fear of bodily injury; annoyance/discomfort insufficient. Alleged incidents fall short of causing objective physical harm apprehension. Contrast cited cases' language with benign nature of communication attempts to see daughter.

Title of section 9: Citing Relevant Case Law C.J.R. v. Fleming Stalking order petitioner must prove fear resulting from reasonable apprehension of physical violence. Petitioner's reactions rooted in frustration, not genuine safety concerns. Argue that subjective claims fail to meet the objective standard of reasonable physical harm fear.

Title of section 10: Citing Relevant Case Law K.A.L v. Hinkle Nonthreatening actions like leaving an object on a car do not equate to stalking. Direct analogy normal parental behavior inaccurately portrayed as threatening. Draw comparison to emphasize innocuous intent behind disputed incidents.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Troxel v. Granville (2000) Legal Analysis Majority opinion: Due Process Clause guarantees fit parents' fundamental right in caring for their children as a central part of liberty interests. Infringement requires proving countervailing interest to overcome presumption that parents act in best interest of child. Dissent cited need to balance parental rights and the interests of the child.

Section 2: Troxel v. Granville (2000) Strategic Application Craft strong rebuttal to anticipated argument of being unfit by citing lack of evidence and DHS findings. Leverage due process clause arguments around liberty interests to defend against false SPO allegations. Argue order lacks compelling state interest given harm to relationship.

Section 3: C.Q.R. v. Wafula Legal Analysis Court reversed stalking order as annoyance and vulgarity do not constitute reasonable alarm or fear under the statute. Discomfort alone does not meet standard requiring apprehension of imminent bodily injury. Lack of explicit threats and no physical confrontation occurred.

Section 4: C.Q.R. v. Wafula Strategic Application Use language around reasonable alarm needed for SPOs. Argue discomfort around parental communication efforts does not reach criminal stalking standards. Explicitly state incidents have never turned physical.

Section 5: C.J.R. v. Fleming Legal Analysis Overturned SPO citing petitioner did not have requisite fear of imminent bodily injury. Mere fear without reasonable belief physical harm is likely does not warrant stalking relief. Risk of conflating subjective and objective standards shown.

Section 6: C.J.R. v. Fleming Strategic Application Stress the need to apply an objective standard concerning likelihood of future harm. Argue petitioner's annoyance falls short. Highlight the lack of rational belief physical attacks would occur.

Section 7: A.A.C. v. MillerPomlee (2019) Key Principles Types of contacts qualifying as unwanted or threatening are not limited to an exclusive list. Diverse behaviors can meet standards for unwanted contact.

Section 8: A.A.C. v. MillerPomlee (2019) Strategic Application Argue alleged incidents are distinguishable from established qualifying examples. Emphasize incidents are different rather than technicalities around definitions.

Section 9: State v. Rangel (1999) Key Principles Pure speechbased contact requires unequivocal threat likely to be followed by violence. Communications must contain unambiguous, specific threats instilling fear of imminent harm.

Section 10: State v. Rangel (1999) Strategic Application Scrutinize speech to demonstrate lack of explicit or implied threats of imminent harm. Compare facts to extreme contextual examples like surveillance or property destruction.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Request for Clarification on Exchanges Keila's absence during an exchange led to a message stating Corbin is not allowed to be present, despite no court order supporting this. The need for clarification on the authority behind such restrictions and the impact on visitation arrangements.

Section 2: Communication Issues Between Corbin and Daughter Lack of discussion or clarity on phone call arrangements beyond one documented call on December 3. Importance of maintaining regular contact between Corbin and Karlee for their relationship and Karlee's Section 3: Special Occasions and Future Events Absence of guidelines or plans for special occasions like the upcoming fatherdaughter dance. Need for clarity on how such events will be handled in the future to ensure both Corbin and Karlee can participate.

Section 4: Impact of Keila's Behavior on Stepdaughter Keila's controlling, disrespectful, and arrogant behavior affecting the stepdaughter's mental health and overall wellbeing. Desire for accountability and addressing the negative impact of Keila's actions on the child.

Section 5: Seeking Clarity on Court Documentation Discrepancies between Keila's verbal directives and official court orders or documents. Importance of aligning verbal instructions with legal requirements to avoid confusion and conflicts.

Section 6: Objecting to Unilateral Decisions by Keila Keila making unilateral decisions without legal basis or court approval. Need for clear boundaries and adherence to established legal procedures in coparenting arrangements.

Section 7: Ensuring Consistent Communication Channels Emphasizing the importance of consistent and open communication channels between all parties involved. Addressing any obstacles or hindrances to effective communication that may impact the child's wellbeing.

Section 8: Advocating for Child's Best Interests Prioritizing the child's best interests in all decisionmaking processes. Seeking clarity on how decisions are made and ensuring they align with the child's welfare and development.

Section 9: Documenting Parental Involvement and Concerns Keeping detailed notes on interactions, exchanges, and issues related to parenting arrangements. Providing a comprehensive record of events to support claims and requests for clarification in court proceedings.

Section 10: Upholding Parental Rights and Responsibilities Asserting parental rights and responsibilities in ensuring the child's wellbeing and healthy development. Advocating for fair treatment, respect, and cooperation in coparenting dynamics for the benefit of the child.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Immediate Danger Motion (November 24, 2021) Kiela files immediate danger motion leading to Karlee being removed from Corbin's home. Significant event triggering legal action and custody changes.

Section 2: Immediate Danger Hearing (December 23, 2021) Immediate danger hearing held where Kiela's motion is dismissed due to lies exposed during testimony. Legal proceedings revealing inconsistencies in Kiela's claims.

Section 3: Custody Modification Filing (Early 2022) Kiela files for custody modification without properly serving notice to Corbin. Lack of proper notification raises procedural concerns in the case.

Section 4: Default Order Filing (February 15, 2022) Kiela files for custody by default order, violating procedural rules. Attempt to secure custody through questionable legal means.

Section 5: CoParenting Discussion (March 2022) Despite legal filings, Kiela agrees to meet at Corbin's home to discuss coparenting issues. Contradiction in actions compared to legal maneuvers.

Section 6: Controversial Custody Transfer (April 8, 2022) Custody hearing results in controversial transfer of custody from Corbin to Kiela. Decision impacting parental rights and child's living arrangements.

Section 7: Communication Challenges Keila's lack of response to messages via OFW causing difficulties in coparenting. Concerns raised about the impact on effective communication and decisionmaking.

Section 8: Supervision Dispute Dispute over supervision during exchanges, including discomfort caused by Keila's boyfriend. Request for clarification on why Corbin cannot accompany during exchanges despite past practices.

Section 9: Legal Procedures Issues with Kiela's filing procedures, including lack of proper service and default orders. Legal missteps affecting the custody case outcomes and fairness.

Section 10: Child's Wellbeing Focus on Carly's wellbeing amidst parental disputes and custody changes. Concerns raised about the impact of the custody battle on the child's emotional state and stability.

UPDF AI: Title of section 1: Overview of the Custody Case Timeline The custody case timeline spans from November 24, 2021, to ongoing events in 2022. Key events include filing immediate danger motions, hearings on false allegations, and custody modifications.

Title of section 2: Allegations and Actions by Kiela Kiela filed immediate danger motions alleging unsafe environment and substance abuse issues. Kiela was caught lying about key details during hearings, raising questions about due diligence by the court.

Title of section 3: Procedural Irregularities and Bias Concerns Judge Simmons' statements indicated potential bias against Corbin. Lack of proper swearingin of Keila before questioning witnesses raised concerns about procedural fairness.

Title of section 4: Impact of False Accusations Keila's ongoing false accusations have led to significant harm in Corbin's life. Loss of parenting time and a stalking order were mentioned as consequences of these accusations.

Title of section 5: Request for New Hearing Plans to request a new hearing to ensure all procedures are followed correctly. Issues with serving proper documents and objections not being raised timely will be addressed.

Title of section 6: Grounds for Requesting a New Hearing Lack of oath for Keila before making accusations may have influenced rulings unfairly. Filing a formal motion citing procedural deficiencies and misrepresentations made to the court.

Title of section 7: Importance of Procedural Fairness Emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and accountability for all parties in custody cases. Highlighting the need for a fair hearing to defend against false allegations and ensure a just outcome.

Title of section 8: Evidence Presentation Providing credible evidence under oath to show key accusations were factually false or misleading. Outlining how each procedural deficiency impacted the ability to have a fair hearing.

Title of section 9: Addressing Judicial Impropriety Seeking to address any judicial impropriety or errors within the previous hearing. Planning to bring back the case in front of the judge to rectify procedural issues and ensure correctness.

Title of section 10: Moving Forward with Legal Action Considering the option of requesting a new hearing to address ongoing issues and procedural concerns. Planning to file a motion for a new custody hearing to correct any errors and ensure a fair process.

UPDF AI: Background of the Case Corbin Parise and Kiela Manes are involved in a custody battle over their 9yearold daughter, Karlee Parise. Kiela's history includes drug abuse, child neglect, and involvement with DHS investigations. Corbin has been actively seeking custody due to concerns for Karlee's wellbeing since 2015.

Unjust Treatment and Legal Actions Despite evidence of Kiela's misconduct, Corbin faced repeated denials of immediate danger motions. Corbin was eventually granted sole custody of Karlee in 2017, which remained unchanged for almost 5 years. In 2021, Kiela obtained temporary orders based on false accusations, disrupting Karlee's life and denying Corbin access.

Recent Developments and Court Rulings In December 2021, despite disproving Kiela's claims, custody was changed to Kiela without factual support. Kiela continued to disrupt coparenting, leading to further legal actions by both parties. Corbin's parenting time was abruptly removed in March 2023 based on unsubstantiated claims and a default judgment.

Impact on Parenting Time and Legal Challenges From March to December 2023, Corbin had limited contact with Karlee, facing obstacles in regaining parenting rights. Multiple hearings and attempts to address legal discrepancies were unsuccessful, leading to ongoing challenges. Kiela's actions, including obtaining a restraining order and stalking allegations, have negatively impacted Corbin's relationship with Karlee.

Motions for Legal Recourse Motion to Vacate Judgment: Seeking to overturn the custody change without proper evidence or findings. Motion to Modify Custody: Requesting a review based on changing circumstances and concerns for Karlee's wellbeing. Motion to Appoint GAL: Advocating for an independent review of the case to ensure Karlee's best interests are considered.

Detailed Outlines for Specific Motions Motion for Change of Venue: Presenting evidence of potential bias and unfair treatment in current court location. Motion to Change Judge: Documenting patterns of favoritism and requesting a new judge based on impartiality concerns. Motion to Bifurcate Issues: Separating custody and protective order determinations to avoid prejudicial influence. Motion for Custody Evaluation: Requesting a professional assessment of parental fitness and child welfare concerns.

Instructions for Pursuing Legal Motions Provide detailed factual statements and legal arguments supporting each motion. Research relevant statutes, case law, and procedural rules for filing motions in Oregon Family Law. Draft affidavits, declarations, and memoranda outlining grounds for the requested legal actions.

Conclusion and Next Steps Despite ongoing legal challenges and unjust treatment, pursuing formal legal recourse is essential. Detailed outlines and evidencebased arguments are crucial for presenting a strong case in family court. Consideration of all available motions and appeals is necessary to secure fair treatment and custody arrangements for Corbin and Karlee.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Kiela's Sudden Change in Behavior Kiela's sudden change in behavior towards Corbin and Karlee. Speculation on Kiela's motivations for the abrupt shift in attitude.

Section 2: Default Ruling Impact Impact of the default ruling in March on parenting time. Lack of awareness about the default ruling leading to restricted parenting time.

Section 3: Limited Communication and Stalking Order Kiela's actions leading to extremely limited phone calls. Obtaining a stalking order against Corbin based on alleged harassment.

Section 4: False Claims in Stalking Order False claims made by Kiela in the stalking order against Corbin. Misrepresentation of events to justify the stalking order.

Section 5: Church Incident Misrepresentation Kiela's misrepresentation of church incidents involving Corbin. Distorted portrayal of Corbin's actions at the church.

Section 6: Manipulative Behavior Kiela's manipulative behavior towards Karlee and Corbin. Using Karlee as a pawn in the custody dispute.

Section 7: Impact on Karlee's Emotional Wellbeing Effects of Kiela's actions on Karlee's emotional wellbeing. Karlee's struggles due to limited access to her father.

Section 8: Corbin's Efforts to Maintain Relationship Corbin's efforts to maintain a relationship with Karlee. Documentation of Corbin's attempts to communicate and be involved in Karlee's life.

Section 9: Legal Actions Taken Against Corbin Legal actions taken against Corbin by Kiela. Kiela's use of legal measures to restrict Corbin's access to Karlee.

Section 10: Corbin's Response and Future Plans Corbin's response to Kiela's actions and false accusations. Plans to address ongoing issues with Kiela and seek modification for the benefit of Karlee.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Background of Custody Dispute Corbin and Kiela's custody dispute over daughter Karlee. Mention of sudden modification of parenting time by Kiela in March 2021.

Section 2: Communication History PostHearing Details about communication posthearing on December 1st, 2023. Reference to a modification filed by Corbin requiring an assessment.

Section 3: Mental Health Records Inclusion of mental health notes for Karlee and Corbin. Implications of these records on the custody case.

Section 4: Legal Proceedings and Court Interactions Challenges faced by Corbin in court regarding default judgment. Judge's responses and limitations during proceedings.

Section 5: Key Issues in Custody Dispute Highlighting parental alienation behaviors by Kiela. Impact of custodial interference on Karlee's wellbeing.

Section 6: Statutes Relevant to Custody Case Discussion on potential statutes applicable to custody disputes. Factors influencing the choice of relevant laws and regulations.

Section 7: Request for Specific Information User seeking clarification on key disputes and agreements. Emphasis on understanding emotional tones associated with each theme.

Section 8: Analysis of Content Provided Insufficient information provided for a thorough analysis. Need for more context to evaluate disputes, agreements, and emotional tones.

Section 9: Guidance on Legal Actions Recommendations on gathering evidence of misconduct. Suggestions for researching legal avenues for accountability.

Section 10: Formulating a Question Assistance in crafting a question for a legal expert. Focus on judicial accountability and daughter's best interests.

UPDF AI: Title of section 1: Overview of Custody Dispute Kyla has made false allegations and used legal tactics to restrict father's custody and time with daughter Carly. Father provided evidence like work schedules to disprove claims but feels the legal system and judge have been biased against him. Frequent custody changes have been distressing for both father and Carly, impacting Carly's wellbeing.

Title of section 2: Concerns about Kyla's Behavior Kyla failed to prioritize Carly's needs, missed important events, and threatened to withhold all custody from father. Her controlling behavior and indifference towards Carly's wellbeing are concerning. Father persevered through adversity in fighting for equal custody rights and acting in Carly's best interests.

Title of section 3: Drafting Objection Letter Paralegal's Perspective Paralegal drafts objection letter on behalf of father disputing terms of proposed custody modification. Highlights unfair treatment, lack of notice in default judgment, and insufficient parenting time granted to father. Requests a hearing to review proposed changes and emphasizes father's commitment to his daughter's wellbeing.

Title of section 4: Revised Objection Letter Father's Perspective Father strongly objects to proposed custody modifications, citing unfair treatment and inadequate parenting time. Details history of sole custody, false stalking allegations, and lack of proof of danger to child's safety. Demands immediate hearing to review changes and threatens legal action if rights continue to be violated.

Title of section 5: Focus on Dismissing Stalking Order Seeking dismissal of stalking order based on unfounded allegations, judicial bias, and infringement on parental rights. Looking for case law precedents supporting dismissal due to lack of evidence, parental alienation issues, and false accusations. Specific focus on role model interference, tort law implications, and procedural fairness in dismissing the order.

Title of section 6: Additional Case Law Precedents Searching for cases involving role model interference, tort law violations, parental rights infringement, false allegations, and lack of proof. Also looking into cases related to judicial bias, procedural issues, and improper issuance of stalking orders. Goal is to find relevant case law to support the request for dismissal of the stalking order.

Title of section 7: Request for Specific Ruling Father indicates the judge must rule in a certain way regarding immediate danger. Emphasizes the need for the judge to deny the immediate danger claim based on lack of credibility. Father expresses concerns about the credibility of the other party involved in the case.

Title of section 8: Narrative vs. Hearing Details Father provides a narrative of events as he experienced them, emphasizing his perspective on the situation. Mentions the importance of the narrative reflecting his lived experiences and observations. Indicates that while questions can be asked, the credibility of the other party is in question.

Title of section 9: Potential Judicial Bias Allegations of judicial bias raised by father in the handling of the custody dispute. Concerns about the judge interpreting questions to fit a certain narrative. Father questions the credibility and fairness of the judge's decisions in the case.

Title of section 10: Importance of Narrative in Legal Proceedings Acknowledgment of the significance of presenting a detailed narrative in legal proceedings. Emphasis on the narrative reflecting lived experiences and observations to provide context. Highlighting the importance of maintaining credibility and accuracy in presenting one's perspective in court.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Background and Context The text provides a detailed background of a complex custody dispute involving Corbin, Kyla, and their daughter Carly. Corbin initially obtained custody due to neglect and danger concerns raised against Kyla. The timeline spans over 8 years, with various legal proceedings, allegations, and conflicts between the parties.

Section 2: Initial Custody Arrangement Corbin was granted primary custody of Carly after raising concerns about neglect by Kyla. Carly spent over 6 years in Corbin's custody, during which Kyla was mostly absent and involved in drugs. Corbin initiated contact between Carly and Kyla, but Kyla remained indifferent.

Section 3: Recent Developments Circumstances led to Carly temporarily going to Kyla, triggering renewed conflict. Kyla has been accused of alienating Carly from Corbin, causing trauma and emotional distress. Issues around missed visitations, restraining orders, and drug testing compliance have further complicated the situation.

Section 4: Legal Proceedings Various legal actions have been taken, including immediate danger orders, restraining orders, contempt charges, and modification hearings. Allegations of bias, manipulation, and procedural irregularities have been raised by both parties. Court decisions have resulted in changes to custody arrangements despite contested hearings.

Section 5: Parental Fitness Concerns Corbin has addressed complaints and proven unfounded allegations regarding substance abuse. Kyla has accused Corbin of being a drug addict, despite negative drug test results. The focus remains on conflicting claims of parental fitness and the best interests of Carly.

Section 6: Impact on Carly Carly has experienced trauma, dental issues, and emotional distress throughout the custody dispute. Missed holidays, birthdays, and alienation tactics have affected Carly's relationship with both parents. The ongoing conflict between Corbin and Kyla has had a significant impact on Carly's wellbeing and stability.

Section 7: Communication Challenges Lack of effective communication between Corbin and Kyla has exacerbated the conflict. Coparenting difficulties, accusations, and legal battles have hindered efforts to reach a resolution. Carly's needs and emotional wellbeing have been overshadowed by the parents' disputes and grievances.

Section 8: Legal Strategy Both parties are advised to work closely with their attorneys to navigate the legal[[]] complexities of the custody dispute. Building a strong case based on evidence, following court orders, and addressing procedural errors are crucial steps. Mediation, counseling, and cooperation for Carly's benefit are recommended to deescalate tensions and focus on the child's welfare.

Section 9: Moving Forward Emphasizing the importance of putting Carly's needs first and resolving disputes constructively is key to moving forward. Documenting incidents, maintaining respectful communication, and seeking professional help if needed can aid in resolving conflicts. Addressing substance abuse or mental health concerns promptly and focusing on coparenting cooperation are essential for a positive outcome.

Section 10: Conclusion and Future Steps Despite the challenges and acrimony, finding common ground and prioritizing Carly's wellbeing should guide future actions. Seeking amicable resolutions, adhering to court protocols, and focusing on constructive engagement can lead to better outcomes. Continuing to advocate for Carly's best interests, working within the legal system, and maintaining a childcentered approach are crucial for the wellbeing of all parties involved.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Immediate Danger Motion Kiela filed an Immediate Danger Motion alleging endangerment by Corbin. Sheriffs removed Karlee from her room, causing significant mental harm. Marks the start of custodial interference by Kiela.

Section 2: Case Dismissal and Unnecessary UAs The case against Corbin was dismissed due to lack of evidence. Corbin was subjected to unnecessary urinary exams (UAs) weekly. Prejudice against Corbin began after an ex parte meeting with Kiela.

Section 3: Parental Alienation and Communication Block Ongoing parental alienation by Kiela, blocking communication between Corbin and Karlee. Karlee dreads visiting Kiela and resents her actions. Kiela avoids responsibilities by demanding UAs from Corbin.

Section 4: Custody Modification Hearing A Custody Modification Hearing resulted in custody being transferred from Corbin to Kiela. No significant change in circumstances was found. Statements by Judge Simmons indicated bias.

Section 5: Continued Legal Struggles Corbin faced challenges presenting his case and perceived bias. Records show difficulties faced throughout 2022. Concerns about unfair treatment persist.

Section 6: Various Court Incidents and Allegations Incidents such as the baby doll incident, church incidents, and visitation issues occurred. Records detail each specific incident. Concerns about parental alienation continue.

Section 7: Concerns About Blocked Communication Ongoing blocking of communication between Corbin and Karlee. Evidence shows records of blocked communication. Impact on Karlee's wellbeing highlighted.

Section 8: Consideration of Judicial Complaint Perceived bias and unfair treatment led to consideration of a judicial complaint. Notes discuss grounds for the complaint. Seeking accountability for judicial actions.

Section 9: Impact on Karlee's Mental Health Karlee's mental health deterioration evident through various incidents. Trauma and distress caused by custody changes and legal battles. Importance of prioritizing child welfare emphasized.

Section 10: Call for Reform and Accountability Petition signed by over 600 citizens demanding reform. Urging officials to be held accountable and restore integrity. Advocating for policy changes aligned with best practices in child welfare.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Identification of Key Legal Issues Primary legal issues involve parental alienation, substance use allegations, evidence disputes, and communication challenges. The documents highlight ongoing custody battles, bias claims, and concerns about the child's wellbeing.

Section 2: Timeline Construction Events span from 2017 to the present, including parental disputes, substance use allegations, and communication breakdowns. Specific incidents like the traumatic removal of the child in November 2021 and a custody modification hearing in April 2022 are key milestones.

Section 3: Contradiction Detection Discrepancies exist between dates mentioned in the documents, such as the timing of a child's ear infection incident. Communication issues are portrayed differently in the documents, with varying start dates indicated.

Section 4: Parental Alienation Allegations Both parents accuse each other of restricting access to the child and poisoning the parentchild relationship. Evidence disputes center around texts, recordings, and past behaviors contributing to the alienation claims.

Section 5: Substance Use Allegations Focus on alleged marijuana and kratom use by one parent, contested by the other party. Past drug use history is referenced in the case documents, adding complexity to the substance use allegations.

Section 6: Communication Challenges Difficulties in effective communication and coparenting since 2020 are highlighted in both the transcript and case history. The timeline shows a progression of communication issues over time, impacting the custody dispute.

Section 7: Judge's Emphasis on Child's Wellbeing Judge expresses concern over frequent filings affecting the child's welfare and urges resolution for the child's sake. Credibility findings are hinted at regarding denial of evidence and text message authenticity.

Section 8: Importance of Evidence Admissibility Disputes arise over the admissibility and interpretation of various evidence, including drug tests, texts, and recordings. Judge's caution against considering evidence solely based on personal animosity between the parties.

Section 9: Impact of Traumatic Events Details emerge on traumatic incidents like the child's removal in November 2021, influencing the custody case. Traumarelated events may serve as grounds for custody modification or evaluation.

Section 10: Recommendations for Case Strategy Utilize judge's remarks on credibility concerns and warnings about frequent filings in building the case strategy. Challenge discrepancies in dates and testimony to strengthen arguments and address inconsistencies effectively.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Immediate Danger/Restraining Order Hearing December 23, 2021 Keila filed an immediate danger/restraining order motion in December 2021. The judge initially denied the motion but later continued with it, leading to gender bias assumptions. Corbin proved Keila wrong during the hearing, possibly causing tension with the judge.

Section 2: Custody Modification Hearing Preparation April 8, 2022 Corbin mentions a gap between the initial denial and the upcoming modification hearing on April 8, 2022. Keila had control over Corbin's life through drug testing and a stalking order. Corbin questions the judge's decision to grant custody to Keila without significant changes or proof of his unfitness.

Section 3: Default Order and Modifications February 15, 2023 A default judgment was filed against Corbin on February 15, 2023, without proper notice or response time. The judge allowed the default order to proceed despite exceeding the 91day limit for such orders. Corbin highlights discrepancies in the legal process and lack of communication from Keila.

Section 4: Court Proceedings and Denials MarchApril 2023 Corbin faced challenges in court proceedings, including motions to vacate the default order being denied. Lack of communication and delays in court responses impacted the legal process. Corbin emphasizes the unfair treatment he received compared to Keila.

Section 5: Judicial Bias Allegations December 1, 2023 Hearing Corbin discusses bias allegations against the judge, citing personal connections between the judge and Keila. Denials of motions and clarifications raise concerns about judicial impartiality. Corbin expresses frustration over the judge's handling of the case and perceived favoritism towards Keila.

Section 6: Contempt Proceedings and False Reports May 2023 Contempt proceedings were initiated against Keila for missed visits and false reports. Corbin presents evidence contradicting Keila's claims and actions. The judge's response to contempt issues raises questions about fairness and accountability.

Section 7: Stocking Order and Clarifications June 2023 Issues surrounding the stocking order and its impact on Corbin's access to Karlee are highlighted. Attempts to clarify misunderstandings and discrepancies in court decisions are met with resistance. Corbin challenges the judge's handling of the case and perceived lack of consideration for evidence.

Section 8: Judicial Commission Complaint July 2023 Corbin submits a complaint to the judicial commission regarding the judge's conduct. Concerns about bias, lack of transparency, and unfair treatment are raised. Corbin seeks accountability for the judge's actions and decisions in the custody case.

Section 9: Impact on Mental Health and Family Dynamics August 2023 Corbin reflects on the mental health impact of the legal proceedings on himself and Karlee. Family dynamics are strained due to ongoing legal battles and custody disputes. Corbin emphasizes the need for fair treatment and justice in the legal system.

Section 10: Continued Legal Challenges and Advocacy September 2023 Corbin continues to advocate for his rights and access to Karlee despite legal obstacles. Efforts to address judicial misconduct and bias persist in the face of adversity. Corbin remains committed to seeking justice and fairness in the custody case.

UPDF AI: Title of section 1: Overview of Custody Modification Hearing The transcript covers a custody modification hearing involving testimony from both parents. Events from 20172022, including parental disputes, alleged substance use, and communication issues, are detailed in the case history documents.

Title of section 2: Judge's Treatment of Past Events Judge dismisses past events as water under the bridge, refusing to consider their relevance (Speaker 1, 00:03:21). This dismissal may indicate bias or unfair treatment towards Corbin Parise.

Title of section 3: Handling of Testimony Keila objects during Cobin's testimony about having an apartment at the time she filed for default judgment against him. Keila allows Cobin to share his perspective without interrupting or objecting during other parts of his testimony.

Title of section 4: Fairness in Proceedings Judge Simmons interrupts Cobin early on to refocus his testimony on legal standards and best interests of Carly. Both parties are given opportunities to present their sides, indicating an attempt at fairness by the judge.

Title of section 5: Moderation of Testimony Judge Simmons reins Cobin back when his testimony becomes speculative or irrelevant, aiming to keep proceedings efficient. She warns Cobin about limiting followup time to allow Keila her turn for crossexamination.

Title of section 6: Objecting to Legal Aspects Speaker expresses uncertainty in handling certain legal aspects, leading to stricken testimony. Challenges faced by the speaker in navigating legal matters are highlighted.

Title of section 7: Reasons for Objecting Insufficient notice or service of process is a common reason to object, especially in cases where expected outcomes are not received. Understanding grounds for objection is crucial in legal proceedings to ensure fair treatment.

Title of section 8: Extracting Statements for Analysis The task involves extracting statements from the court transcript that may indicate bias or unfair treatment towards one party over the other. Comparing statements made by the judge to identify differences in treatment between the parties.

Title of section 9: Key Themes Identified Themes such as parental disputes, substance use allegations, and communication issues emerge from the case history documents. Analyzing these themes can provide insights into the dynamics of the custody case and potential areas of contention.

Title of section 10: Importance of Documented Evidence Documented evidence plays a crucial role in custody cases to support claims and provide a factual basis for decisions. Ensuring accurate documentation and presentation of evidence is essential for a fair and just resolution in custody disputes.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Introduction to Custody Dispute The text introduces a complex child custody case involving multiple parties. Key themes include parental alienation, substance use allegations, evidence disputes, and communication issues.

Section 2: Judge's Emphasis on Child's Wellbeing The judge emphasizes the negative impact of frequent filings on the child's wellbeing. Statements from the judge highlight the importance of resolving the dispute for the child's sake.

Section 3: Judge's Criteria for Admissible Evidence The judge states that evidence solely showing parental dislike towards each other will not be considered. Credibility concerns are raised if one party denies ownership of incriminating texts.

Section 4: Relevance of New Relationship in Case The judge deems texts from Mr. Parise's current wife relevant as the relationship began postjudgment. This indicates the court considers postjudgment relationships in custody cases.

Section 5: Discrepancies in Dates and Communication Issues Dates differ regarding key incidents like the earring infection, raising questions about timeline accuracy. Communication issues between parents are highlighted, with discrepancies in when they began.

Section 6: Traumatic Incidents and Custody Modification More details emerge on traumatic events like the child's removal in November 2021. Recommendations include leveraging these incidents to argue for custody modification.

Section 7: Challenges and Recommendations Recommendations include highlighting warnings about frequent filings and denying evidence. Challenges involve discrepancies in dates, testimony, and emphasizing credibility concerns.

Section 8: Judge's Treatment of Corbin Paris Corbin Paris expresses feeling mistreated by the judge during the proceedings. Examples include interruptions, assumptions about motives, and skepticism towards his testimony.

Section 9: Reviewing Judge Anne Marie Simmons' Conduct A systematic review is requested to analyze bias or unequal treatment in the hearing transcript. Expectations include evaluating fairness, attitude towards both parties, and indicators of impartiality.

Section 10: Crafting an Updated Objection The objection letter addresses due process violations, differential treatment, and credibility concerns. Promises, expectations, and requests are outlined, including legal action, fair evaluation, and appellate review.

UPDF AI: Section 1: Overview of Case Notes Analysis The user seeks a thematic analysis of their case notes, focusing on child welfare and court decisions. Key themes identified include concerns about child welfare, safety, court decisions, parental alienation behaviors, noncompliance with court orders, and manipulation of evidence. Important events highlighted include allegations against Corbin, immediate danger motion, case dismissal, unfounded UA demands, ongoing parental alienation behaviors, custody transfer to Kiela, and multiple court incidents.

Section 2: Strategic Plans and Process Description The user outlines a strategic plan involving extensive document organization, categorization, and preparation for a comprehensive legal analysis of their custody case. Various programs and platforms like Voice Record Pro, PDFAI, and KeyMate are utilized for document storage, tagging, and analysis. The result aims to provide a datadriven and insightful analysis to navigate the complexities of the custody dispute.

Section 3: Detailed Document Management System The user employs a robust document management system centered around the Voice Record Pro folder within iCloud Drive. Documents are categorized into subfolders based on types such as legal filings, evidence, personal notes, and expert opinions. A meticulous tagging system is implemented to enhance document accessibility and usability.

Section 4: Folder Structure and Categorization The Voice Record Pro folder contains various subfolders like PDFAI, Scanned Docs, Text Messages, and Background for organizing different types of documents. Specific folders like Findings Action Item Notes, Paxo, and Transcribe further categorize materials for easy retrieval. The structured folder hierarchy facilitates efficient crossreferencing of relevant documents.

Section 5: Tagging and Labeling System Implementation A comprehensive tagging and labeling system is applied to documents, including tags for document types, relevance, content themes, dates/events, and involved parties. Tags like Legal Filings, Custody Can't create, edit, or upload

…

Not enough storage.

Clean up space

Get storage

Name

Owner

Last modified

File size

More sorting options

pre-trial-brief.md

karlee.raes.mom

Sep 19, 2024

2 KB

PROMPT P 2.md

karlee.rae

Published using